How have your ideas around ‘authenticity’ and ‘truth’ evolved as your photography has become more sophisticated?
- Authenticity and truth have been key focuses for my photographic practice. I considered photojournalism and particularly the Magnum photographers important inspirations for my work.
- Since those early inspirations I have diversified the types of work I look at and have found the line between storytelling and truth blur. I am finding the concept of narrative photography particularly interesting, where the images are produced in a creative or directed way but still communicate a story. A good example is the portrait, in the past I would have waited for the right moment, for someone to fill the space I wanted to capture. Or I would have stopped people on the road and produced a portrait. Now, I prearrange times and meeting points with subjects. I position them within the frame, wait for the right light. I took inspiration from Alec Soth when developing my approach to photography. He is a Magnum photographer but controls his subjects and the narratives in his work through organisation rather than chance.
- I think that I am more likely to consider the audience when making images in my current practice. I feel asking myself questions like ‘what will the audience understand from this image?’ or ‘how will an audience member connect with this image?’ lead to better consideration, connection and communication through the photograph, even if this means choosing how the subject is sat, or whether they are engaged or disengaged with the camera.
Have you ever ‘designed events to be photographed’? Or have you ever been aware that your presence, with a camera, has had a direct influence on a turn of events that might otherwise not have happened, had you not been there with a camera?
- My current practice is predominantly ‘designed’. Through communication with my subjects both before and during the photographic process I set up and create the image in collaboration with a person. There are aspects of my practice which are less designed, for example if I am photographing in the landscape, I am not sure what I am going to discover. However, I research and area or place before visiting so I can gain a better understanding of what I am going to photograph.
- The camera is always an intrusive machine. It feels that people in the modern day have an obsession with being captured by a camera, whether that be moving or still images. As children and young people, we are trained to ‘smile for the camera’ which lays the foundations for a dynamic between camera and subject that is difficult to break. The concept of the smile in a photograph is that other people will see an image and will see a person ‘looking their best’. As we grow as people this relationship between subject and machine continues to strengthen to the point where smiling the natural reaction to someone pointing a camera at us, even if we do not feel happy.
- If the camera is not used as an influential tool would people feel obliged to smile?
- This also makes me consider if there is a predominant relationship between photography and perceived positivity?
- Photographers have captured sadness, illness and death, however what is the relationship between the average, enthusiast photographer and works like Araki’s Sentimental Journey/Winter’s Journey?
- To what extent does the family album and snapshot aid our memory of a loved one? Due to the positive nature of general imagery could this cloud the judgement of a person? Not everyone will have read Camera Lucida, how far is the educated photographic community blinded by Barthes’ references to his mother and how we then associate photographs with emotion and memory?